• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • FACULTY OF EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY
    • PETROLEUM ENGINEERING (TEKNIK PERMINYAKAN)
    • DISSERTATIONS AND THESES (PE)
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • FACULTY OF EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY
    • PETROLEUM ENGINEERING (TEKNIK PERMINYAKAN)
    • DISSERTATIONS AND THESES (PE)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analysis Sensitivity Lateral for Hydraulics NBT - 059 Well

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    [1] 101321026 - Nabila Tika Muslikha - Teknik Perminyakan - LaporanTugasAkhir.pdf (4.567Mb)
    [1] 101321026 - Nabila Tika Muslikha - Teknik Perminyakan - LaporanTugasAkhir.pdf (4.567Mb)
    Date
    2025-08-12
    Author
    Muslikha, Nabila Tika
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Extended Reach Drilling (ERD) presents significant challenges in hydraulic management and efficient hole cleaning, which can limit the horizontal reach of the well. This study is based on the question of the technical limits of ERD drilling. The objective is to conduct a hydraulic sensitivity analysis of the added lateral length to assess operational efficiency and determine the maximum reach that can be achieved with current equipment capabilities. In this study, a hydraulic simulation method using Wellplan software was used to examine six lateral extension scenarios (HD ratio of 2:1 to 6.5:1) in the NBT-059 well. Each scenario was assessed for feasibility based on key operational constraints, including maximum pump pressure (5,000 psi), flow rate to clean the hole, and Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD). The results showed that narrowing by increasing the lateral length decreased the maximum achievable flow rate. The analysis showed that increasing the lateral length led to a decrease in the maximum achievable flow rate, which narrowed the operational window significantly from 144 GPM in the 2:1 HD scenario to 5 GPM in the 6:1 HD scenario. The 6.5:1 HD scenario was considered infeasible because its maximum flow rate (245 GPM) was below the minimum flow rate to clean the hole (249.51 GPM) and the required circulation pressure (5,002.96 psi) exceeded the rig capacity due to the narrow operational window.
    URI
    https://library.universitaspertamina.ac.id//xmlui/handle/123456789/14507
    Collections
    • DISSERTATIONS AND THESES (PE)

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV